-- Leo's gemini proxy

-- Connecting to gemini.techrights.org:1965...

-- Connected

-- Sending request

-- Meta line: 20 text/gemini;lang=en-GB

● 06.21.10


●● Gates Foundation Hires More Advertising Agencies to Spin its Work in the Press; Gates Grantees Are Complaining, Finds Survey


Posted in Bill Gates, Deception, Marketing, Microsoft at 5:26 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz


Summary: The Gates Foundation adds more PR muscle to its operations; new survey (conducted by/for the stakeholder) shows internal problems


THE BILL GATES™ brand is being embellished further. The more it’s worth, the more lobbying power it has. According to this new report from PR Week, it’s not enough for Gates to just have numerous external PR agencies working on his image full time. He wants more, he wants everything. This latest report suggests that another PR firm will use its “global reach” to indoctrinate the world and tell each citizen of Earth that the world’s richest person is also most lovable (never mind his crimes that gave him money in the first place).


↺ brand

↺ this new report

have numerous external PR agencies

working

his image

his crimes that gave him money in the first place


> The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation expanded its work with Weber Shandwick, awarding the firm its global communications business after a competitive bid.The firm began work on the account June 1. Melissa Milburn, deputy director of media relations for the foundation, said by e-mail that Weber Shandwick was selected because of the firm’s “global reach.”


Edelman and others are already involved in this PR campaign too. There are billions of dollars at stake. It’s about brand power and it also helps Microsoft, based on a recent survey of public opinion.


“It’s about brand power and it also helps Microsoft, based on a recent survey of public opinion.”Journalists need to be given only the opportunity to tell one side of this story, based on Gates’ vision. He sincerely believes he’s doing the right thing. Our previous post showed similar practices being used to sell Office 2010; in this case, the product is Bill Gates and the investment portfolio he is boasting.


similar practices being used to sell Office 2010


Further to last week's example from Nigeria we have this PR piece which neglects to mentioned Gates’ investments that increase polio too. That’s what we call one-sided coverage. They repeat what Gates’ PR agencies tell them and never reach out for all the facts. Charm pieces are being spread in many languages, which breeds consent among the population with limited access to information.


last week's example from Nigeria

↺ this PR piece

↺ neglects


It is not news that the Gates Foundation insists on secrecy (except the PR facet). A survey has just found that the Gates Foundation has “overwhelmingly negative” feedback from the respondents.


↺ Gates Foundation

↺ found that the Gates Foundation


> A survey of more than 1,500 organizations receiving grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation shows numerous frustrations and challenges in working with the world’s largest philanthropy.Last year, the Gates Foundation hired the Center for Effective Philanthropy to survey 1,544 of its grantees. Although respondents indicated strong ratings for the foundation’s positive impact on knowledge, policy and practices, responses were overwhelmingly negative.Organizations complained about inconsistent communications, a lack of responsiveness, unclear goals, strategies and decision-making processes.


The Seattle Times (which has always been biased) says that the “Gates Foundation gets low marks in relations with non-profits”:


↺ says that


> The Gates Foundation received lower than average ratings in many aspects of its relations with grantees, CEO Jeff Raikes disclosed in a letter today.The results were disclosed following a survey of more than 1,500 non-profits who received grants from the Gates Foundation over the last year. Raikes said the foundation worked with the Center for Effective Philanthropy to measure the perceptions of its grantees.“They say we are inconsistent in our communications, and often unresponsive,” he wrote.


Here is the report from the Gates Foundation and its apologists [1, 2]. Will transparency increase as a result of this survey? Or will the foundation continue to snub critics by ignoring them altogether (there is a long track record when it comes to that).


↺ the report

↺ 1

↺ 2


Last week we shed some light on the foundation's role in Haiti, but more of the same PR continues to appear, never with a mention of Monsanto (whose Vice President is inside the Gates Foundation). For background, see posts such as:


we shed some light on the foundation's role in Haiti

↺ Vice President is inside the Gates Foundation


With Microsoft Monopoly in Check, Bill Gates Proceeds to Creating More MonopoliesGates-Backed Company Accused of Monopoly Abuse and InvestigatedHow the Gates Foundation Privatises AfricaReader’s Article: The Gates Foundation and Genetically-Modified FoodsMonsanto: The Microsoft of FoodSeeds of Doubt in Bill Gates InvestmentsGates Foundation Accused of Faking/Fabricating Data to Advance Political GoalsMore Dubious Practices from the Gates FoundationVideo Transcript of Vandana Shiva on Insane PatentsExplanation of What Bill Gates’ Patent Investments Do to Developing WorldBlack Friday Film: What the Bill Gates-Backed Monsanto Does to Animals, Farmers, Food, and Patent SystemsGates Foundation Looking to Destroy Kenya with Intellectual MonopoliesYoung Napoleon Comes to Africa and Told OffBill Gates Takes His GMO Patent Investments/Experiments to IndiaGates/Microsoft Tax Dodge and Agriculture Monopoly RevisitedBeyond the ‘Public Relations’UK Intellectual Monopoly Office (UK-IPO) May be Breaking the Law“Boycott Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in China”The Gates Foundation Extends Control Over Communication with Oxfam RelationshipWeek of Monsanto


Here is a new report about more lobbying from Gates. We don’t know if GMO is part of it.


↺ new report


> The Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN) argues that this is indeed the case. The project financed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is lobbying for the enrichment of foods destined for the dinner tables of children and adults across Africa.


There are some causes that are good, but the way they are marketed to the public (for self glorification) sometimes deserve scrutiny. For instance, many news sites [1, 2, 3, 4] including the MSBBC are still promoting the same PR about women, children, and babies (story mentioned and dissected last week) and few mention the controversies and ulterior motives. █


↺ 1

↺ 2

↺ 3

↺ 4

↺ MSBBC

↺ controversies


Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.


Permalink  Send this to a friend


Permalink

↺ Send this to a friend



----------

Techrights

➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.

-- Response ended

-- Page fetched on Sun May 5 03:55:53 2024