-- Leo's gemini proxy
-- Connecting to shizy.srht.site:1965...
-- Connected
-- Sending request
-- Meta line: 20 text/gemini
Condition: VG6
Location: Home, Spearfish: 44.49, -103.87
Target: ζ Coronae Borealis
Const: Corona Borealis
RaDec: 15h39m +36°38
Scope: ST80
Setting: 57x
Double: AB: 315°
Started by zeroing in on α Coronae Borealis and increasing declination until I hit the expected star pattern.
Target: σ Coronae Borealis
Const: Corona Borealis
RaDec: 16h14m +33°52
Scope: ST80
Setting: 57x
Double: AB: 260°
Started by navigating to ν Coronae Borealis (since it's very distinguishable) and decreased RA from there.
Target: M 13
Const: Hercules
RaDec: 16h41m +36°28
Scope: ST80
Setting: 57x
Navigated to ζ Herculis and increased declination until the cluster appeared. Not the best night for viewing a cluster, but I was anxious to see one again. Very bright and seems to be densely packed.
Target: ρ Herculis
Const: Hercules
RaDec: 17h23m +37°09
Scope: ST80
Setting: 75x
Double: AB: 330°
Increased RA from M13 until π and ρ came into view.
Target: δ Herculis
Const: Hercules
RaDec: 17h15m +24°50
Scope: ST80
Setting: 120x
Double: AB: 300°
Moved behind a power-line right after I located it, so I had to wait for a few minutes until it appeared again. Had trouble distinguishing the sibling from other background stars in the FOV.
Target: 95 Herculis
Const: Hercules
RaDec: 18h01m +21°36
Scope: ST80
Setting: 92x
Double: AB: 260°
Navigated to ν Herculis and decreased declination. Very neat split. Both are almost of equal size and magnitude.
Target: M 92
Const: Hercules
RaDec: 17h17m +43°80
Scope: ST80
Setting: 57x
Increased declination from π Herculis. At first glance, appeared to be smaller than M13. Overtime using AV, I got the impression that the size was almost as large as M13 but more faint around the perimeter.
-- Response ended
-- Page fetched on Mon May 13 08:54:48 2024