-- Leo's gemini proxy

-- Connecting to nul.cities.yesterweb.org:1965...

-- Connected

-- Sending request

-- Meta line: 20 text/gemini

|``, `-    |
|    - |   ╨
|   i__,\  |
=============

 ..  .   |
▐  . |  ...
▐   /-\  |
=============


/    _
\ /\ |


   /   \ -   .      | |  |             `\   /_   _
/\ \ < / = - o |\ | / |\ | /-\ / \ /.\ !/ o \  C | \/
         \/
\./ \/\/ /\ `/ 3


/_  _     |-     -    -|_
\ /\|/ \/\/= |/ \= \./=||

alːʕːvenʒ
1  2   3

1. al
   'adhearance, formatted
2. ʕ
   'with conceptualization of
3. venʒ
   'grouped up, gaggled together -informal


venʒ // suffix
ʒ͡fěl // prefix

alʕvenʒ -informal
ʒ͡fělʕʒm -formal

ʒ͡fělːʕːʒm
1     2 3


1. ʒ͡fěl
  `partitoned group, ranked
2.ʕ
  `with conceptualization of
3.ʒm
  `bonded group


t͡svit͡sːʒʊn
1 2    3

1.t͡svi
  `ocular~ ongoing Sight, ongoing light sensory
2.t͡s
  `ongoing process
3.ʒʊn
  `semi-negation of group identifier "ʒ" via suffix "on" which:
     ``on
         `self-referential -- indicating a specific -- i.e, an element specified from the whole. (although not specified in any grammar, the element that is referenced is the speaker's action in the case of "ʒon". Other aspects of an individual are specified even further with many declensions -- most of which are unrelated to their non "on" roots.)


eʰʁʒ
1    2

1.eʰʁ
  `non adhearing
2.ʒ
  `plural


There is an interesting idea in constraining the denomination of formality and informality to denotation in the prefix or suffix, respectively.

 Ʒ  is used to denote a plural conceptualization. It is like a phonetic building block, which is meant to be used along nouns to create a described noun, ʒ, said alone, can be used contextually to indicate a pluralization. I
 In the word ʒ͡fělʕʒm, the -͡fěl is not adherent to grammar.Instead, -͡fěl has mutated itself unto the word over generations of use. It acts more as a unique, word-bound article that calls on the attention to be undivided. It uses a similar concept to ‘importance in redundancy’, but rather than repeat the ʒ noise eg. ʒʒʕʒm, a colloquially aesthetic sound is instead slotted into place. There is known variation in the sound used, which is at discretion to whatever region, as to which sound proceeds ʒ.

	The ʕ is a grammatical descriptor insert that calls for relevance association. Just as ʒ functions, ʕ clarifies that there is relation to be had. Often, the relation will be positive, but it may also be negative. It is meant to be interpreted within the context that it is spoken, and the one who has spoken it. Its meaning varies drastically, and is only used wherein two polars are speaking. An example of contextual vaguity: should a Higher refer to a Lower, of the clergy , in this narrowed example, I.e. Bishop to his Preisters, Preisters to his Flock, then alʕvenʒ would be expected to refer to the whole of the Lower entity being referred. It is considered formal here, because it is how a father might refer to his son, or a master may refer to his squire.
There is an acceptance of space between the two, and a forethought to the dignity in correspondence between one another. Ʒ͡fělʕʒm would indicate a proposal to rise, and is used to display trust, confidence, and interest.

Aside:  It is not unlike the Lower clergy to be referred to in this way by the Higher at least once, although it is thought to be used as a kind of conditioning tactic that beguiles the followers into a false craving of these affirmations. As one might bait a dog into performing.

	In the converse context, should the Lower clergy wish to refer to the High, they are humbly acknowledging the prestige and wisdom of the Ʒ͡fělʕʒm. It is a cry of violent disgust to label them alʕvenʒ, because it breaks the polar relationship between the two, in which the Higher is definite and the Lower is definite, contextually, via cultural, region, virtue etc…There are many instances of these used in administrative documents, or documents that wish to attain a formal, serious attitude about them. There are documentations of battles, fights, spouts, toss-arounds, verbal vulgarity, general indecency, etc… as a rebuttal to verbal non compliance. And the same done within letters and writs of any kind. ʒ appears at the beginning of this address of the Higher entity, while it ends the address to the Lower.```
-- Response ended
-- Page fetched on Sun Apr 28 08:22:09 2024