-- Leo's gemini proxy
-- Connecting to gemini.techrights.org:1965...
-- Connected
-- Sending request
-- Meta line: 20 text/gemini;lang=en-GB
02:30 *psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
04:15 *GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@qiahibkh2iwka.irc) has joined #techbytes
05:07 *grotto (~qwedfg@joseon-4kf.1vi.0hrpvb.IP) has joined #techbytes
05:07 *grotto (~qwedfg@joseon-4kf.1vi.0hrpvb.IP) has left #techbytes
05:42 *DaemonFC has quit (Quit: Leaving)
07:22 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@asrpphbur8fa4.irc) has joined #techbytes
08:52 *psydroid4 (~psydroid@cqggrmwgu7gji.irc) has joined #techbytes
09:02 schestowitz; <li>
09:02 schestowitz; <h5><a href="https://tedium.co/2022/01/21/10-forgotten-audio-file-formats/">Sounding Board</a></h5>
09:02 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 404 @ https://tedium.co/2022/01/21/10-forgotten-audio-file-formats/">Sounding )
09:02 schestowitz; <blockquote>
09:02 schestowitz; <p>This format deserves the honor of being the first audio format most people ran into with digital rights management already baked in.</p>
09:02 schestowitz; <p>While RealNetworks tie to MusicNet also had DRM baked in, Microsoft tended to have the leverage thanks to its ownership of Windows, and WMA was used in numerous successors to its early DRM music store Pressplay, including Napster and the Zune Music Store.</p></blockquote></li>
09:07 *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
09:08 *liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
09:10 *rianne has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds)
10:07 *tech_exorcist (~tech_exorcist@cr3y5h5kah6hq.irc) has joined #techbytes
10:32 *rianne_ (~rianne@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes
10:32 *rianne (~rianne@joseon-jhg.17c.k31cok.IP) has joined #techbytes
10:33 *liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes
10:58 *tech_exorcist has quit (Quit: Leaving this network)
11:27 *SomeH4x0r (~someh4xx@4qc3338mpcm6n.irc) has left #techbytes (I mostly confuse these channels with #techrights anyway)
12:01 *spazzz is now known as spazz
12:38 *Audubons (~sid214174@joseon-4kf.1vi.0hrpvb.IP) has joined #techbytes
12:38 *Audubons (~sid214174@joseon-4kf.1vi.0hrpvb.IP) has left #techbytes
13:11 *liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
13:11 *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
13:12 *rianne has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds)
13:12 *Despatche has quit (Quit: Read error: Connection reset by deer)
13:25 *rianne (~rianne@joseon-jhg.17c.k31cok.IP) has joined #techbytes
13:25 *rianne_ (~rianne@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes
13:26 *liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes
13:31 schestowitz; https://nitter.eu/phantom09331632/status/14851764334757150
13:31 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 404 @ https://nitter.eu/phantom09331632/status/14851764334757150 )
14:36 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
14:45 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@asrpphbur8fa4.irc) has joined #techbytes
15:09 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
15:26 *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
15:27 *liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
15:28 *rianne has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds)
15:40 *Audubons (~sid214174@joseon-4kf.1vi.0hrpvb.IP) has joined #techbytes
15:41 *Audubons (~sid214174@joseon-4kf.1vi.0hrpvb.IP) has left #techbytes
16:19 *rianne_ (~rianne@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes
16:19 *rianne (~rianne@joseon-jhg.17c.k31cok.IP) has joined #techbytes
16:20 *liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes
16:42 *Audubons (~sid214174@joseon-4kf.1vi.0hrpvb.IP) has joined #techbytes
16:44 *Audubons (~sid214174@joseon-4kf.1vi.0hrpvb.IP) has left #techbytes
17:16 *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
17:17 *liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
17:17 *rianne_ (~rianne@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes
17:18 *rianne has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds)
17:18 *rianne (~rianne@joseon-jhg.17c.k31cok.IP) has joined #techbytes
17:19 *liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes
17:27 schestowitz; http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2022/01/off-we-go-unified-patent-court-is.html?showComment=1642870258441#c3361368697184941011
17:27 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | Off we go! The Unified Patent Court is officially born. - The IPKat
17:27 schestowitz; "
17:27 schestowitz; Whether the PAP has legally entered into force is not really clear. Mr Ramsay has announced a declaration to be signed at the COREPER, but no such ceremony has been announced. Would it have taken place, it is more than certain that the Preparatory Committee would have heralded it loud and clear.
17:27 schestowitz; Replacing UK by IT is in principle acceptable, provided that all the signatory states agree, or at least those having ratified up to now.
17:27 schestowitz; Amending in such a way Art 3 of the PAP is however not changing anything as far as Art 7(2) UPCA is concerned. In the explanatory note for the second ratification a reference to Art 31 VCLT was made. But nothing has apparently happened.
17:27 schestowitz; Whilst an agreement on Art 3 PAP seems possible, it is more than doubtful that an agreement on Art 7(2) UPCA is possible. I cannot see IT and NL accepting that the duties originally allocated to London will provisionally be transferred to Paris and/or Munich. This is the more since Mr Ramsay, in his latest interview in JUVE, clearly mentioned the fact that in the end there could only be 2 sections in the central division. Should three sections
17:27 schestowitz; remain, it is also not sure whether FR and DE would not prefer to keep the very interesting files in IPC classes A and C for themselves and shift less interesting technical domains to a third and why not even a fourth location.
17:27 schestowitz; The three locations were only chosen as none of the three contenders FR, GB and DE would not let loose and claimed the whole central division for themselves.
17:27 schestowitz; What good is it deciding the provisional application of the UPC, when such a Damocles sword hanging over the UPC?
17:27 schestowitz; Should the files originally meant to go to London be, provisionally or not, transferred to Paris and/or Munich it is possible to consider that such a court is functioning in breach of Art 6(1) ECHR. How can a decision taken in Paris and/or Munich on files in classes A and C be enforced?
17:27 schestowitz; "
17:32 *Despatche (~desp@u3xy9z2ifjzci.irc) has joined #techbytes
18:06 *Audubons (~sid214174@joseon-4kf.1vi.0hrpvb.IP) has joined #techbytes
18:07 *Audubons (~sid214174@joseon-4kf.1vi.0hrpvb.IP) has left #techbytes
18:35 *DaemonFC (~daemonfc@957jzbu5csdjw.irc) has joined #techbytes
19:48 *DaemonFC has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
21:05 *DaemonFC (~daemonfc@389qztengum92.irc) has joined #techbytes
21:07 *GNUmoon2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
22:06 *GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@e38kzwsbvddm6.irc) has joined #techbytes
23:48 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@asrpphbur8fa4.irc) has joined #techbytes
-- Response ended
-- Page fetched on Sat May 18 06:04:32 2024