-- Leo's gemini proxy
-- Connecting to gemini.techrights.org:1965...
-- Connected
-- Sending request
-- Meta line: 20 text/gemini;lang=en-GB
00:00 *psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
00:30 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
00:31 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
00:34 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
00:34 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
00:47 *rsheftel14351 (~rsheftel@freenode-4nq.hn3.1cipql.IP) has joined #techbytes
00:48 *rsheftel1435 has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds)
00:48 *rsheftel14351 is now known as rsheftel1435
02:59 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
03:19 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@5tcc2vuaj9aks.irc) has joined #techbytes
05:00 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> hey are you online?
05:00 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> hi
05:00 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> Hey Dr. Schestowitz. I am not sure how to kick this request off, but, I've been kind of observing Matthew Garrett's twitter over the last year since he defamed me on it about a year ago and I'm seeing about every 3-4 months he's defaming someone else habitually. The more I search around the more I see familiar names of people who were contributing that got completely derailed by wild accusations.
05:00 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes>
05:00 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> I think it's reached a point where it is probably a good idea to start collecting for a timeline of every incident I can find, but your coverage indicates a much better knowledge base to start with in re: to MG
05:00 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> Ted T'so comes to mind
05:00 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> he sent me several letters from his lawyers
05:00 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> uh oh
05:00 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> do we need a more confidential communication medium to discuss this?
05:00 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> no
05:00 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> but I covered this in techrights
05:00 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> im looking for it
05:00 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> http://techrights.org/2021/12/25/timewasting-lette
05:00 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-techrights.org | Stupid and Legally-Invalid Threats (Physical Letters) | Techrights
06:22 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> im through most of it now. fyi, california has a 1 year limit from the time of the initial statement (when it was made, not when they found it) to file with the court to start a defamation trial
06:22 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> he won't do anything
06:22 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> intimidation tactic
06:22 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> he defamed me
06:22 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> he legally can't if it's for anything you ever said longer than 1 year ago
06:22 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> http://techrights.org/2021/03/05/google-funded-trolls/
06:22 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> this video is a lot shorter
06:22 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> i have also been making statements about his serial defamation behaviours for longer than a year so i am also immune to litigation over it
06:22 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> would not shock me if he was connected to a state entity
06:22 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> seeing how he attacks people and who he chooses to attack
06:22 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Resolving timed out after 10520 milliseconds ( status 0 @ http://techrights.org/2021/03/05/google-funded-trolls/ )
06:22 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> i suspect he's a FAANG-sponsored saboteur/contractor
06:22 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> suspect? Gulag funded him
06:22 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> well i can't definitely prove that google came to him and said "we will pay you $X for systamtically targeting people doing things against our Y interests"
06:22 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> it does not work like that
06:22 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> people can be rewarded or chosen for past and future actions
06:22 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> i want to bring this guy down with a "sword of truth"
06:22 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> the kind of truth that sticks to you, and smears onto anything you touch. the kind that does not wash off.
06:53 *Despatche has quit (Quit: Read error: Connection reset by deer)
07:04 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> to do that, i will need to compile a sourced timeline for a website that will be search-engine optimised and tied to his name
07:04 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> it should be a kind of "curriculum vitae" of his malicious behaviours over the years, highly segmented
07:04 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> after the search engines start tracking it, all standard PR campaign principles apply
07:04 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> one of the problems with exposing this guy so far has been that so few people are talking about it, so, he can just attack their individual credibility and keep it at bay
07:04 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> (as you've seen so far)
07:04 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> i've run into the same issue
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> since he is undermining your pulications' credibility he can dampen your impact, and since my only sources so far are your publication, we have an "entity spread" problem
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> as he does the same with me
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> *publications*
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> since we have immunity from being litigated by him over those statements i am well positioned to run a campaign like that
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> i also have a six digit income with legal resources if he tries to strongarm me with lawyers
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> to avoid complicating things i wont involve you much, but you have alot of the information collected that i'll need, so, if it's alright with you I will be occassionally sending you an email asking for sources to cite on things i find from your own sources so that i can start to spread this out to other publications and get the information socialized
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> i am just seeing alot of impactive material here in the videos
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> but
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> first is the timeline
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> i have a feeling we can collect at least 10 years of defamatory behaviour
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> http://techrights.org/2022/06/21/linux-foundation-words-hypocrisy/
07:05 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-techrights.org | Words You Cannot Say Unless You Are the Linux Foundation | Techrights
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> sorry, wrong link
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> http://techrights.org/2015/10/07/forking-with-hypocrisy/
07:05 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-techrights.org | Hypocrite Forks the Linux Kernel Because of Cultural Characteristics That He Himself is Guilty of | Techrights
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> http://techrights.org/wiki/UEFI
07:05 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-techrights.org | UEFI - Techrights
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> starting 10 years ago
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> e.g. http://techrights.org/2012/06/09/uefi-mistake/
07:05 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-techrights.org | Red Hat Criticised for Advancing Microsofts UEFI Agenda | Techrights
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> i have to be careful with the IBM stuff. if this is a confidential discussion i'll tell you why.
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> (i'd need a gaurantee of confidence)
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> (also, you know who I am right?)
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> I can only offer pointers, nothing more
07:05 schestowitz[TR]; <schestowitz[TR]> I want to get on with work
07:26 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> re: UEFI, I agree it's a categorical threat to the F/OSS ecosystem, but I see the UEFI action as separate from the defamatory behaviours except where we can tie it to specific acts of defamation that we can capture/archive and reference
07:26 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> it'll be hard to socialize the anti-defamation sentiment in the academic circles he'll try to lean on for credibility when the exposure campaign starts to heat up
07:26 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> if we don't separate the two out except where a direct link can be found
07:26 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> i.e. it's even worse than the defamation, but he'll be able to rely on credibility/image on EUFI if the defamation doesn't have a focal point
07:26 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> *UEFI
07:26 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> im still forming models but if the vehicle for his exposure is the same he uses to hurt people (SJW) then any action he takes to bolster his SJW activity (which is almost always harmful) will also bolster the exposure campaign levied against him
07:26 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> and then when he's at a low in terms of credibility, the UEFI villainry could be a deathblow because he won't have as strong a platform to rest on, as the only thing keeping it at bay is apologists for toxic SJWs
07:26 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> if they won't want to support him because he's been strongly outted as a serial defamer, it just all falls back on him when UEFI starts to come back up
07:26 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> i think part of the problem so far is i see in these publications that you're addressing a broader issue that's bigger than MG and involves broader corporate strategies, but this can get in the way of addressing the man himself in terms of content distraction or focal points
07:26 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> not that the FAANG issue doesn't need addressed, i just would separate out content like "this post is purely about MG" and "this post is purely about FAANG but references issues with MG"
07:26 schestowitz[TR]; <phanes> idk im still brainstorming on how to approach this. i know there will be a website. i am figuring out how the content will work. it will read like a wikipedia page or a CV but be a timeline of people he's defamed and will have a section devoted to UEFI, but will focus purely on his defamatio
09:25 *GNUmoon2 has quit (connection closed)
09:26 *GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@yk58f7khufeyg.irc) has joined #techbytes
10:21 *techrights_guest|33 (~56f6207d@54n9xgft8g6u2.irc) has joined #techbytes
10:30 *techrights_guest|33 has quit (Quit: Connection closed)
11:10 schestowitz; <li>
11:10 schestowitz; <h5><a href="https://sysadmin-journal.com/what-is-a-network-sniffer/">What is a network sniffer?</a></h5>
11:10 schestowitz; <blockquote>
11:10 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-sysadmin-journal.com | What is a network sniffer?
11:10 schestowitz; <p>In this blog post I try to explain what is a network sniffer device or software? But before we understand that there a few things we should become familiar with.</p>
11:10 schestowitz; </blockquote>
11:10 schestowitz; </li>
11:11 schestowitz; <li>
11:11 schestowitz; <h5><a href="https://jvns.ca/blog/2022/07/09/monitoring-small-web-services/">Monitoring tiny web services</a></h5>
11:11 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-jvns.ca | Monitoring tiny web services
11:11 schestowitz; <blockquote>
11:11 schestowitz; <p>Hello! Ive started to run a few more servers recently (nginx playground, mess with dns, dns lookup), so Ive been thinking about monitoring.</p>
11:11 schestowitz; <p>It wasnt initially totally obvious to me how to monitor these websites, so I wanted to quickly write up what how I did it.</p>
11:11 schestowitz; <p>Im not going to talk about how to monitor Big Serious Mission Critical websites at all, only tiny unimportant websites.</p>
11:11 schestowitz; </blockquote>
11:11 schestowitz; </li>
11:12 schestowitz; <li>
11:12 schestowitz; <h5><a href="https://blog.arduino.cc/2022/07/06/reviving-a-classic-sony-ps-x75-record-player-with-arduino/">Reviving a classic Sony PS-X75 record player with Arduino</a></h5>
11:12 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-blog.arduino.cc | Reviving a classic Sony PS-X75 record player with Arduino | Arduino Blog
11:12 schestowitz; <blockquote>
11:12 schestowitz; <p>In 1979, Sony launched the PS-X75 turntable. It quickly gained popularity thanks to its high-fidelity sound output and ease of use. It was easy to use because it was fully automateda common feature today, but something that was quite exciting at the time. To perform that automation, the PS-X75 contained an integrated circuit that detected record size, dropped the needle, and so on. But that IC was prone
11:12 schestowitz; to failure. To revive their Sony PS-X75 turntable, MKB-1 used an Arduino Mega to replace the original circuit.</p>
11:12 schestowitz; </blockquote>
11:12 schestowitz; </li>
11:45 schestowitz; <li>
11:45 schestowitz; <h5><a href="https://rubenerd.com/a-decade-without-blog-comments/">A decade without blog comments</a></h5>
11:45 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Rubenerd: A decade without blog comments
11:45 schestowitz; <blockquote>
11:45 schestowitz; <p>I suppose over time Ive engineered a new problem. People now routinely email me with interesting, useful, fun, and friendly comments; and now I have a backlog to reply to and quote here. I apologise if that includes yours. I do read every email I receive, unless Fastmails aggressive filters block it and I fish it out of spam a month later.</p>
11:45 schestowitz; </blockquote>
11:45 schestowitz; </li>
11:48 *Despatche (~desp@u3xy9z2ifjzci.irc) has joined #techbytes
12:27 *schestowitz-TR2 (~acer-box@freenode/user/schestowitz) has joined #techbytes
12:27 *schestowitz-TR has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds)
12:41 *psydroid2 (~psydroid@memzbmehf99re.irc) has joined #techbytes
15:43 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
15:45 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@5tcc2vuaj9aks.irc) has joined #techbytes
17:14 schestowitz[TR]; https://www.fosslife.org/how-install-tor-browser-linux
17:14 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.fosslife.org | How to Install the Tor Browser on Linux
17:14 schestowitz[TR]; "The Tor browser is a security-focused browser that protects users through the use of nodes that make it more difficult to track your online actions.
17:14 schestowitz[TR]; This article provides detailed instructions for installing (and removing) the Tor browser on your Linux system."
21:03 schestowitz[TR]; Re: EPO presentation
21:03 schestowitz[TR]; > Hi,
21:03 schestowitz[TR]; >
21:03 schestowitz[TR]; > I Heard management showed some slides to the staff saying not granting
21:03 schestowitz[TR]; > patents are a loss.
21:03 schestowitz[TR]; >
21:03 schestowitz[TR]; > This is insane.
21:03 schestowitz[TR]; >
21:03 schestowitz[TR]; > I will try to get a copy, don't publish anything for now.
21:03 schestowitz[TR]; Any update?
22:29 *psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
-- Response ended
-- Page fetched on Sat May 18 04:58:11 2024