-- Leo's gemini proxy
-- Connecting to gemini.techrights.org:1965...
-- Connected
-- Sending request
-- Meta line: 20 text/gemini;lang=en-GB
00:47 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
00:48 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
00:59 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
00:59 *SaphirJD has quit (connection closed)
00:59 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
01:05 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
01:06 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
01:12 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
01:14 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
01:19 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
01:20 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
03:08 *schestowitz[TR] has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
03:08 *schestowitz[TR] (~schestowitz[TR]@hcdms2vr9hu9e.irc) has joined #techbytes
03:12 *Techrights-sec2 has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds)
03:12 *Techrights-sec2 (~quassel@freenode-i33.jp8.7132oi.IP) has joined #techbytes
03:13 *Techrights-sec2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
03:13 *Techrights-sec2 (~quassel@hcdms2vr9hu9e.irc) has joined #techbytes
05:02 *techrights_guest|1 (~490bc725@54n9xgft8g6u2.irc) has joined #techbytes
05:20 *techrights_guest|1 has quit (Quit: Connection closed)
07:47 schestowitz; <li>
07:47 schestowitz; <h5><a href="https://www.talospace.com/2022/07/and-now-real-risc-v-laptop-maybe.html">And Now A Real RISC-V Laptop ... Maybe</a></h5>
07:47 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.talospace.com | And now a real RISC-V laptop ... maybe
07:47 schestowitz; <blockquote>
07:47 schestowitz; <p>Phoronix is reporting the first production RISC-V laptop, (code?) named ROMA, with "a quad-core RISC-V CPU (although clock frequencies are not noted), a GPU/NPU accelerator [and reportedly other features], up to 16GB of LPDDR4/LPDDR4X RAM [and] up to 256GB of storage." This sounds great, except that I was seriously underwhelmed by the Allwinner D1 in the DevTerm R-01, so the lack of CPU specs is not
07:47 schestowitz; encouraging. There are also two distinct process nodes for the System-on-Module, 12nm for Pro and 28nm for Normal, so there may be a wide gulf between configurations. On the other hand, it does prominently claim to be upgradable, possibly by swapping out the modules. Strangely, it advertises itself with an ARM SC300 secure enclave, which seems a bit odd as well.</p>
07:47 schestowitz; </blockquote>
07:47 schestowitz; </li>
07:50 schestowitz; <li>
07:50 schestowitz; <h5><a href="https://linuxgizmos.com/i-mx8m-mini-powers-pico-itx-board-and-supports-yocto-based-linux-distributions/">i.MX8M Mini powers Pico-ITX board and supports Yocto-based Linux distributions</a></h5>
07:50 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 520 @ https://linuxgizmos.com/i-mx8m-mini-powers-pico-itx-board-and-supports-yocto-based-linux-distributions/ )
07:50 schestowitz; <blockquote>
07:50 schestowitz; <p>The eDM-SBC-iMX8Mm is a Single Board Computer (SBC) which comes in a small Pico-ITX form factor and its powered by NXPs i.MX8M Mini System on Chip (SoC). This compact device was designed to run 24/7 to suit applications such as kiosks , digital signage displays, smart home appliances etc.</p>
07:50 schestowitz; <p>DATA MODUL has designed this SBC to be coupled with NXPs i.MX8M Mini Dual Cortex-A53 (up to 1800 MHz) or its Quad-core version. Both CPU models integrate a GCNanoUltra GPU with a 2D/3D accelerator and they include up to 512KB L2 in Cache memory.</p>
07:50 schestowitz; </blockquote>
07:50 schestowitz; </li>
08:04 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
08:07 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
08:31 schestowitz; are there any access codes or not yet? sorry to hear about the AC...
09:46 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
09:51 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@5tcc2vuaj9aks.irc) has joined #techbytes
10:16 *psydroid2 (~psydroid@memzbmehf99re.irc) has joined #techbytes
11:00 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
11:00 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
13:42 *GNUmoon2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
13:47 *GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@vayqsuzqttqha.irc) has joined #techbytes
15:57 *techrights_guest|20 (~d52d6a5b@54n9xgft8g6u2.irc) has joined #techbytes
16:06 *techrights_guest|20 has quit (Quit: Connection closed)
20:45 schestowitz; http://patentblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/06/27/survey-epo-staff-dont-trust-top-management-concerns-about-quality/
20:45 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-patentblog.kluweriplaw.com | Survey: EPO staff dont trust top management, concerns about quality - Kluwer Patent Blog
20:45 schestowitz; "
20:45 schestowitz; Staff members of the EPO have little confidence in the top management. They dont think there is a clear and coherent strategy, there are big concerns about quality and also about the increasing work load. This is shown by the fifth Technologia Survey, the results of which have been shared with staff last week.
20:45 schestowitz; The survey, which was commissioned by trade union SUEPO, reveals deep divisions between management and staff. It was published just ahead of the meeting of the Administrative Council, 29 and 30 June 2022, in which a decision about the re-appointment of Antnio Campines as EPO president for a second term until 2028 is on the agenda.
20:45 schestowitz; One sign of the lack of trust between staff and management is the fact that the Technologia survey could be held among SUEPO members only and those among EPO staff who actively opted in, since president Campinos refused SUEPO to use EPO emails*.
20:45 schestowitz; Some results in more detail:
20:45 schestowitz; I think top management has set out a clear and coherent strategy for the EPO: 31% of respondents said they totally disagree, 33% tend to disagree, 21% are neutral, 14% tend to agree and 2% totally agree.
20:45 schestowitz; I support the strategy of the EPO set out by top management: 39% totally disagree, 32% tend to disagree, 21% neutral, 7% tend to agree, 1% totally agree.
20:45 schestowitz; In my view, the actions of top management and the strategy adopted have departed considerably from the role that the EPO should be playing in the European patent system: 6% totally disagree, 12% tend to disagree, 20% neutral, 31% tend to agree, 32% totally agree.
20:45 schestowitz; I identify with top managements view: 46% totally disagree, 35% tend to disagree, 15% neutral, 4% tend to agree, 1% totally agree.
20:45 schestowitz; I identify with the views of Staff Representation: 1% totally disagree, 5% tend to disagree, 17% neutral, 51% tend to agree, 27% totally agree.
20:45 schestowitz; Questions about the level of trust in superiors show a staggering 3% confidence in president Campinos and 1% in the Management Advisory Committee, whereas the confidence in immediate superiors is relatively good.
20:45 schestowitz; Trust in my immediate superior : 7% very little, 12% little, 24% neutral, 35% much, 22% very much
20:45 schestowitz; My director : 20% very little, 19% little, 37% neutral, 18% much, 6% very much
20:45 schestowitz; My Principal Director/COO : 50% very little, 26% little, 20% neutral, 4% much, 1% very much
20:45 schestowitz; My Vice President : 47% very little, 24% little, 23% neutral, 6% much, 1% very much
20:45 schestowitz; The Management Advisory Committee: 60% very little, 24% little, 16% neutral, 1% much, 0% very much
20:45 schestowitz; The President : 61% very little, 23% little, 13% neutral, 3% much, 0% very much
20:45 schestowitz; Quality
20:45 schestowitz; The survey also clarifies there are concerns about the quality of the work the EPO produces and about recent reorganizations.
20:45 schestowitz; In reaction to the statement: Do you consider that the introduction of a performance-related bonus at the level of the individual employee is a good thing for the QUALITY OF THE WORK produced by the European Patent Office?: 61% answered they totally disagree, 28% tend to disagree, 10% tend to agree, 1% totally agree.
20:45 schestowitz; With the following statement: the current president and top management have taken useful measures to maintain and improve the quality of the EPOs products and services, 38% totally disagrees, 32% tends to disagree, 19% is neutral, 11% tends to agree, 1% totally agrees.
20:45 schestowitz; Staff members were asked as well how many times the operational organigram around your post within the EPO had been restructured in the last three years. 19% answered never, but more than 80% of respondents had experienced such restructuring (once 30%, twice 34%, three times or more 18%).
20:45 schestowitz; These reorganizations concerning their post were pointless, according to 86% of respondents. 72% said that the constant reorganizations and restructuring over recent years are pointless and have a negative effect on my situation.
20:45 schestowitz; In the meantime, the economic situation of the EPO is favorable, according to most respondents: 2% say: disagree and it bothers me, 6% disagree, 66% agree, 26% say agree and I appreciate
20:45 schestowitz; Equality
20:45 schestowitz; The Technologia survey was also about the personal situation of staff members. A remarkable result is the reaction to the statement: Employees are treated equally at the EPO: 32% totally disagrees, 30% tends to disagree, up sharp since the 2020 survey, in which these numbers were 8% and 22% respectively.
20:45 schestowitz; Some other findings:
20:45 schestowitz; I can expand my professional competences: 14% answer: disagree and it bothers me, 38% disagree, 40% agree, 9% says: agree and I appreciate
20:45 schestowitz; The amount of work I am tasked with is acceptable: 29% disagree and it bothers me, 36% disagree, 30% agree, 5% agree and I appreciate
20:45 schestowitz; My work pace is acceptable: 24% disagree and it bothers me, 34% disagree, 37% agree, 5% agree and I appreciate
20:45 schestowitz; My professional activity allows me to balance work life and private life: 20% disagree and it bothers me, 30% disagree, 41% agree, 10% agree and I appreciate
20:45 schestowitz; My work is interesting: 7% disagree and it bothers me, 17% disagree, 55% agree, 21% agree and I appreciate
20:45 schestowitz; Remarkable also is the reaction to the statement: Do you work outside the hours provided for by the regulations governing your working hours? 58% work in the evening or at night, 26% during weekends or public holidays, 16% during holidays. 36% dont work outside working hours.
20:46 schestowitz; This a huge change compared to earlier Technologia surveys, in which many more respondents said they did not work outside working hours: 76% in 2010, 69% in 2013, 61% in 2016, 58% in 2020.
20:46 schestowitz; Proud
20:46 schestowitz; Asked to describe the work atmosphere at the level of the EPO, respondents mentioned the words: tense (56%), confrontational (35%), cold (31%), warm (2%), cheerful (1%).
20:46 schestowitz; 69% of staff feel very tired (sometimes, often or always), 42% feel depressed and 37% feel desperate. 67% think their current work life affects their health.
20:46 schestowitz; 93% of respondents said they were fairly (44%) of very (49%) proud to work for the European Patent Office before. But asked whether they are proud to work for the European Patent Office now, only 34% said they are fairly proud, and a mere 8% is very proud.
20:46 schestowitz; *Over 6545 staff, the questionnaire was sent to 2915 and 1766 participated.
20:46 schestowitz; _____________________________
20:46 schestowitz; Kluwer IP Law
20:46 schestowitz; This page as PDF
20:46 schestowitz; LIKE? SHARE WITH YOUR FRIENDS.
20:46 schestowitz; Post navigation
20:46 schestowitz; NEXT ARTICLE
20:46 schestowitz; A preliminary injunction can be based on a patent application
20:46 schestowitz; MATTHIEU DHENNE (IPSILON)/JUNE 28, 2022
20:46 schestowitz; PREVIOUS ARTICLE
20:46 schestowitz; The metamorphosis of the trainee into an employee inventor
20:46 schestowitz; MATTHIEU DHENNE (IPSILON)/JUNE 24, 2022
20:46 schestowitz; 18 comments
20:46 schestowitz; Kluwer Patent Blog
20:46 schestowitz; JUNE 27, 2022 AT 11:18 AM
20:46 schestowitz; Dear Reader,
20:46 schestowitz; The publisher and editor of the blog may at their discretion remove submitted comments and/or other material from the blog if they have reason to believe that the materials are in violation of the editorial policy.
20:46 schestowitz; We ask our readers and commenters to follow these guidelines:
20:46 schestowitz; Be polite. Avoid derogatory comments and respond to the argument, not its messenger. Any ad hominem attacks will not be tolerated. If a comment includes such an attack, the whole comment will not be published. There will be no discussion on this.
20:46 schestowitz; Avoid repetitiveness. If you havent convinced the other person after commenting twice, you will probably not succeed the third time.
20:46 schestowitz; Be specific and concise. A reaction of 200 well-chosen words is often better than a lengthy expos.
20:46 schestowitz; Extraneous Attorney
20:46 schestowitz; JUNE 27, 2022 AT 11:43 AM
20:46 schestowitz; These results are appalling. In any sane public sector organization, the only conclusion would be that a major shake-up in management is urgently needed.
20:46 schestowitz; Now, of course, this being the EPO, I am not holding my breath.
20:46 schestowitz; Mismanagement
20:46 schestowitz; JUNE 27, 2022 AT 12:33 PM
20:46 schestowitz; One may say that there is some consistency in EPOs top management goals/actions for the past 10 years since the same questionnaire over 5 iterations shows a solid coherence in negative results.
20:46 schestowitz; The dogmatic beliefs of pseudo top managers who have no clues nor competencies with regard to those they are in charge of, prevail over the interests of the applicants or the public at large.
20:46 schestowitz; Their sole interest is to please the administrative council delegations so that their contract be extended and they get bonuses and functional allowances in return for deteriorations of the working conditions for the examiners and support staff.
20:46 schestowitz; This mismanagement within a european public organisation is scandalous.
20:46 schestowitz; Concerned observer
20:46 schestowitz; JUNE 27, 2022 AT 5:29 PM
20:46 schestowitz; The results of the survey clearly point to a demotivated, stressed and depressed workforce that has little to no trust in management and serious concerns regarding quality of the EPOs output. There is simply no way of dressing this up: the results demonstrate that the current President has failed miserably to resolve social tensions at the EPO.
20:46 schestowitz; When the AC appointed the current President, their public pronouncements gave the impression that resolving social tensions would be a key priority for him. But will an epic failure with respect to this key performance indicator prevent his reappointment? More specifically, being in mind the potential gifts to the AC delegations that CA 32/22 might place at the disposal of the President, how seriously will the AC view the Presidents abject
20:47 schestowitz; failure to restore social peace?
20:47 schestowitz; Caballero
20:47 schestowitz; JUNE 27, 2022 AT 7:02 PM
20:47 schestowitz; Considering that 92% of those asked agree with the economic situation and that 76% find their work interesting is a pretty good starting point. The communications problem between management and staff has been evident for quite some time and escalated to levels where change appears to be inevitable. Can EPO find a 21st century manager?
20:47 schestowitz; Martin
20:47 schestowitz; JUNE 28, 2022 AT 12:05 PM
20:47 schestowitz; The EPO needs a 1960s or 70s manager.
20:47 schestowitz; Someone who grew through the organisation and knows the work being done.
20:47 schestowitz; An engineer/chemist/scientist, not an MBA, nor a politician.
20:47 schestowitz; But that is true for most companies and organisations
20:47 schestowitz; Caballero
20:47 schestowitz; JUNE 29, 2022 AT 11:55 AM
20:47 schestowitz; That person would be about 100 years old by now. I like the idea of a wise old man/woman, but I am not sure if he/she would want to put up with this.
20:47 schestowitz; Concerned observer
20:47 schestowitz; JUNE 28, 2022 AT 12:16 PM
20:47 schestowitz; In response to your question, ask yourself whether the AC even bothered with interviewing any alternative candidates. My suspicion is that the wait for a manager of the EPO who has any respect for the rule of law let alone 21st century management practices will become much like the wait for Godot.
20:47 schestowitz; Caballero
20:47 schestowitz; JUNE 29, 2022 AT 12:02 PM
20:47 schestowitz; It was meant more as rhetorical question, with a challenge to a constructive approach. Sort of like Open your mind
20:47 schestowitz; Concerned observer
20:47 schestowitz; JUNE 29, 2022 AT 3:45 PM
20:47 schestowitz; Yet again it seems that my suspicions we well founded:
20:47 schestowitz; https://www.epo.org/news-events/news/2022/20220629a.html
20:47 schestowitz; Attentive Observer
20:47 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.epo.org | EPO - Antnio Campinos reappointed President of the European Patent Office
20:47 schestowitz; JUNE 27, 2022 AT 9:34 PM
20:47 schestowitz; The result of the survey is clearly not in favor of the top management.
20:47 schestowitz; This is nothing new, but the speed at which the present tenant of the 10th floor has alienated his own staff is flabbergasting.
20:47 schestowitz; In any well run organisation it would bring about a change in the upper management by the controlling body. But at the EPO the tail is wagging the dog.
20:47 schestowitz; As long as the AC accepts to rubber stamp any decision proposed by the management the situation will continue to deteriorate.
20:47 schestowitz; The quality might deteriorate, but until the effects are felt, there is a great latency time. This in favor of management as it allows to show figures of production/productivity which guarantees a steady flow of renewal fees. That all what matters for the AC.
20:47 schestowitz; That lots of patents come out of the opposition procedure maimed or even revoked is not a problem for bulk filers. They still have enough patents in their portfolio. When it hits a SME with a few patents, the story is different.
20:47 schestowitz; This is one of the white elephants in the room!
20:47 schestowitz; The problem is that the present head of the office and its predecessor confuse immunity with impunity!
20:47 schestowitz; Disgusted
20:47 schestowitz; JUNE 28, 2022 AT 1:36 PM
20:47 schestowitz; The results of the other survey, the official one with >5000 respondents, organised by the office itself, will be out at the end of July. They will be even more impressive: zero trust from employees towards all managers.
20:47 schestowitz; Still, despite all empty promises. nobody at the EPO expects anything to actually happen.
20:47 schestowitz; Ill be gone at the end of this year. You are stuck with the Portuguese until 2028.
20:47 schestowitz; Working in paradise
20:47 schestowitz; JUNE 28, 2022 AT 2:53 PM
20:48 schestowitz; To all those who think that the EPO is heaven on earth, according to my info in 2021 more than 50% FIFTY of the job applicants to an examiner position at EPO who were offered a job did not take it, many of them not even bothering to inform the EPO that they would not come.
20:48 schestowitz; So to those who think that the working conditions at EPO are over the top, that the working atmosphere is cool or the kind of work one performs there is so exciting, well sorry but Gen Z and millennials may beg to differ
20:48 schestowitz; law sniffer
20:48 schestowitz; JUNE 29, 2022 AT 11:19 AM
20:48 schestowitz; I am glad to see some figures now, just as a reference: where I work (and is one of the most renowned employers, at least in chemistry) only one out of four positively interviewed candidates accepts the offer at the end and we make use of a consulting company which does for us an intensive and professional hunting and pre-selecting job ahead of our interviews. This could depend from the fact that we are very selective and demanding when
20:48 schestowitz; choosing our potential new colleagues, if we were to choose with a lower professional expectation and less rigorous selection the acceptance rate would be for sure higher
20:48 schestowitz; Troll sniffer
20:48 schestowitz; JUNE 29, 2022 AT 7:29 PM
20:48 schestowitz; On average, a job offer is declined in less than 30% of the cases. Google is your friend.
20:48 schestowitz; So, either you misunderstood your statistics or you work in a really terrible place.
20:48 schestowitz; Working in paradise
20:48 schestowitz; JUNE 29, 2022 AT 11:43 PM
20:48 schestowitz; Dear law sniffer
20:48 schestowitz; all depends from where you start from. I do not dispute that you may find worse conditions elsewhere but this is irrelevant and not the point.
20:48 schestowitz; All reforms forced on the workforce for past two decades were not contributing in any way to make of the EPO a stronger office from a qualitative point of view. It squeezed the lemon dry, with now tired, depressed and more precarious workers rubber-stamping patents to meet their stupid targets and avoid being removed at the end of their contract.
20:48 schestowitz; This is not a sustainable management, this does not serve the public.
20:48 schestowitz; EPO is lost
20:48 schestowitz; JUNE 28, 2022 AT 5:19 PM
20:48 schestowitz; its an open secret for those who know the backstage of the EPO but the only time the EPO hired HR consultancy to run a selection procedure for VPs years ago, the one candidate who was not selected as he was clearly identified as unfit for the position due to his profile, is the very same man who was hired as president of the EPO a few years later and who will lead this beautiful organisation into social chaos as well as the IP community into
20:48 schestowitz; despair.
20:48 schestowitz; Nothing could stop him to act erratically as he and his minions did, not even the courts, the dozens of EU MPs questioning the EU Commission or the Council of Europe which passed a motion signed by dozens of MPs, and not even the bad press throughout Europe which recurrently reminded the society of the deleterious things that occurred at EPO.
20:48 schestowitz; So hoping to find competency at the highest level of the EPO is illusory since contrary to the EU institutions in Brussels, the EPO does not dispose upon check and balances and can exercise without any true public scrutiny and transparency, into what is now very much looking like unethical governance.
20:48 schestowitz; I remember a striking parallel done between the EPO and the FIFA in an article which years ago tried to alert the public on the situation to no avail. Not even Germany, Switzerland, the NL or the Scandinavian countries which are always prone to give the world lessons in Ethics and the Rule of Law did act to restore the situation http://www.fosspatents.com/2015/06/striking-structural-parallels-between.html
20:48 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.fosspatents.com | FOSS Patents: Striking structural parallels between the European Patent Office and soccer body FIFA
20:48 schestowitz; Roy Schestowitz
20:48 schestowitz; JULY 1, 2022 AT 4:08 AM
20:48 schestowitz; I dont typically post comments here, but I just wanted to say to whoever posts these articles on EPO issues, well done and carry on. Dont let EPO management bully you (or the blogs publisher) into changing topics or sanitising comments. Theyve done this to many sites before. Theyre NOT AN ORDINARY PATENT OFFICE!
20:48 schestowitz; Comments are closed.
20:48 schestowitz; GET BLOG POSTS IN YOUR INBOX!
20:48 schestowitz; Email
20:48 schestowitz; wolters Kluwer
20:48 schestowitz; wolters Kluwer
20:48 schestowitz; GO TO POSTS ON
20:48 schestowitz; (Compulsory) license (Cross-border) jurisdiction (Indirect) infringement Amendments Biologics Brexit Case Law Chemical Engineering Damages Denmark Enforcement EPC EPO EPO Decision Equivalents European Union Exceptions to patentability Extent of Protection France Germany Infringement Injunction Inventive step Italy Litigation Netherlands Novelty Opposition Patents Pharma Pharmaceutical patent Procedure Revocation Scope of protection Second Medical
20:48 schestowitz; Use SEP Spain SPC Sufficiency of disclosure Switzerland Unitary Patent United Kingdom United States of America UPC Validity
20:48 schestowitz; NUMBER 3 IN TOP 10 PHARMA PATENT BLOGS TO FOLLOW IN 2022!
20:48 schestowitz; Pharma Patent Blogs
20:48 schestowitz; BLOG CONTRIBUTORS
20:48 schestowitz; Brian Cordery
20:48 schestowitz; Bristows
20:48 schestowitz;
20:49 schestowitz; Rik Lambers
20:49 schestowitz; Brinkhof
20:49 schestowitz;
20:49 schestowitz; Daniela Ampollini
20:49 schestowitz; Trevisan & Cuonzo
20:49 schestowitz;
20:49 schestowitz; Thorsten Bausch
20:49 schestowitz; Hoffmann Eitle
20:49 schestowitz;
20:49 schestowitz; John Collins
20:49 schestowitz; Clayton Utz
20:49 schestowitz;
20:49 schestowitz; Matthieu Dhenne
20:49 schestowitz; Ipsilon
20:49 schestowitz;
20:49 schestowitz; Simon Holzer
20:49 schestowitz; MLL Meyerlustenberger Lachenal Froriep Ltd. (MLL)
20:49 schestowitz;
20:49 schestowitz; Binxin Li
20:49 schestowitz; Baker & McKenzie FenXun (FTZ)
20:49 schestowitz;
20:49 schestowitz; Vaishali Mittal
20:49 schestowitz; Anand and Anand
20:49 schestowitz;
20:49 schestowitz; Miquel Monta
20:49 schestowitz; Clifford Chance
20:49 schestowitz;
20:49 schestowitz; Thomas Musmann
20:49 schestowitz; Rospatt Osten Pross
20:49 schestowitz;
20:49 schestowitz; Alexa von Uexkll
20:49 schestowitz; Vossius & Partner
20:49 schestowitz;
20:49 schestowitz; Anders Valentin
20:49 schestowitz; Bugge Valentin
20:49 schestowitz;
20:49 schestowitz; VAEPC-2021
20:49 schestowitz; Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2022 Edition
20:49 schestowitz; Kaisa Suominen, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge
20:49 schestowitz; 105
20:50 schestowitz; Practical-Guide-to-Succesful-IP-Valuation
20:50 schestowitz; Practical Guide to Successful Intellectual Property Valuation and Transactions
20:50 schestowitz; Alexander Puutio
20:50 schestowitz; 135
20:50 schestowitz; Internet-Law
20:50 schestowitz; Internet Law: A Concise Guide to Regulation Around the World
20:50 schestowitz; Edward J. Swan
20:50 schestowitz; 112
20:50 schestowitz; Chinese-patent-law
20:50 schestowitz; Chinese Patent Law: A Practical Guide
20:50 schestowitz; Sun Changlong, Zhang Junjie, Fanwen Kong, Dang Li, Yongbo Li, Zhang Liang (William), Wang Meng, Zhang Qiulin, Wang Rong, Gu Runfeng, Chen Shasha, Lu Weiting, Ge Xiaomei, Yang Yang, He Yibo
20:50 schestowitz; 148
20:50 schestowitz; KLUWER IP LAW NEWS ALERT
20:50 schestowitz; Stay informed on Intellectual Property law & developments
20:50 schestowitz; SEARCH POSTS
20:50 schestowitz; RSS FEEDS
20:50 schestowitz; Summary Feed
20:50 schestowitz; Article Feed
20:50 schestowitz; RELATED SITES
20:50 schestowitz; Kluwer IP Law
20:50 schestowitz; Kluwer Copyright Blog
20:50 schestowitz; Kluwer Trademark Blog
20:50 schestowitz; Regulating for Globalization Blog
20:50 schestowitz; Author Portal
20:50 schestowitz; "
22:48 *techrights_guest|7 (~92463172@54n9xgft8g6u2.irc) has joined #techbytes
22:54 *techrights_guest|7 has quit (Quit: Connection closed)
23:16 *psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
23:34 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
23:35 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
23:54 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
23:54 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
23:57 *Despatche has quit (Quit: Read error: Connection reset by deer)
-- Response ended
-- Page fetched on Sat May 18 07:22:10 2024