-- Leo's gemini proxy

-- Connecting to flexibeast.space:1965...

-- Connected

-- Sending request

-- Meta line: 20 text/gemini;lang=en_AU

Non-sexual kink isn't somehow ‘superior’ to sexual kink


[ Originally posted in a different space, 2022-06-15. ]


Kink doesn't have to involve sex, but it doesn't have to _not_ involve sex.


Non-sexual kink isn't somehow ‘superior’ to sexual kink. Sexual play isn't ‘lesser’ than non-sexual play.


For some of us, kink and sex are interwoven. Some of us have kinks from which the sexual component cannot be removed.


Kink and sex are distinct concepts; one doesn't imply the other. But making sexual kink a second-class citizen is not only sex-negative - it's _kink_-negative in its failure to support the diversity of Risk-Aware Consensual Kink.



🏷 kink,sexuality,sociology

Glossary

Gemlog Home

-- Response ended

-- Page fetched on Tue May 21 17:49:24 2024