A call for software

Thank you everyone for the kind words - I'm thrilled to be back.

Still looking through the (C) spec. I'd like to find a compromise between (B) and (C). There's a lot of good points raised in the (C) draft spec, and I'm not convinced that supporting both simultaneously is reasonable for client/server authors. Expect more on this in a few days - I'll be looking for feedback.

While that happens, I'm going to put a list of all known Misfin software on the misfin.org site, so here's your chance to self-promote - anyone writing something they want to show off?

The list

Posted in: s/misfin

🚀 lem-two [mod]

Jan 12 · 4 months ago · 👍 gritty, jmjl

3 Comments ↓

👤 nikhotmsk · Jan 12 at 22:58:

Unable to view link. Incomplete header.

🐐 satch · Jan 13 at 00:20:

I don’t have this problem, link seems fine to me.

🚀 mk270 · Jan 15 at 06:07:

there's a list here:

— gemini.ucant.org/heterodox-tech/misfin.gmi

I'd also stress that there's no definitive misfin(C) "spec" - only a few draft proposals